[AR] Re: Accounting for cured HTPB in ProPEP

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 11:38:58 -0700

On 3/31/2018 9:59 AM, Henry Spencer wrote:

On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, William Claybaugh wrote:
Given a homogeneous mix, it would seem that the propellant at the bottom of an SRB would be no further from the nozzle then the propellant at the top of a 9"diameter motor (of 70" grain length)...

Although that's the worst case for the SRB, and the best case for the 9" motor -- the *average* kilogram of propellant is rather farther away in the SRB.

Still, Sutton8 says that even in the Star 27 apogee motor -- which is near-spherical, 800lb gross weight, with relatively short gas paths -- the propellant is 16% aluminum.  Given that this is a "final stage", I'd think its details would be well optimized.  Clearly there are some subtleties here.

Correct me if I'm wrong (and here I'm sure someone will) but wouldn't average combustion dwell-time for a metal particle be more a matter of a motor's internal volume relative to the nozzle area (pressure a factor also of course) rather than the linear distance to the nozzle from a given particle's origin?

Henry V


Other related posts: