[procps] Re: How to correctly use readtask (or: please expose free_acquired)
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:47:23 -0700
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Can you either provide some (actual, documented) guidance on how this
>> is supposed to work and/or improve the API a bit? Something like
>> free_static_proc that does free_acquire(0) would be nice. allocproc
>> would be a decent alternative (it could just malloc a proc_t and
>> memset it to 0, but it would be clear what's going on).
>
> Gack. Can you also add a way to *copy* a proc_t while you're at it,
> or at least a nondestructive variant of readtask?
>
> --Andy
AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGGGGGGGGGH! Neither Fedora nor Ubuntu's packages
even manage to export freeproc.
--Andy
Other related posts:
