Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga
- From: Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: veeeraman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:11:27 -0600
On 8/19/2010 2:33 PM, Ram Raman wrote:
Hi
We have an application running on 10.2 with ASMM which was recently
upgraded to a newer version of the application, still running 10.2.
After the upgrade we got some errors related to shared pool. We tried
flushing shared pool. The error would go away temporarily but would be
back after a while. Last week we bumped up the shared_pool_reserved
size to 260MB from the default size. It was ok for a while, but then
we ran into errors with shared pool again, which prevented us from
logging into the database. We had to bounce the instance. It seems ok
for now. Is it alright to increase the SPRS further or do I have to
worry about latch contention.
Querying shared_pool_reserved view after the bounce an hour ago shows
us that the request failures is 28. Our sga target is 4.5Gb now.
Thanks.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
