That is not a good practice. SYS objects have their own cache, described in the ancient V$ table called "V$ROWCACHE" (coming all the way from version 6.0). Puttin those tables explicitly in the keep pool will not buy you anything but it will waste some memory. On 03/25/2004 11:42:09 AM, thump604@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Has anyone evaluated or have any experience placing any dictionary objects in > the keep pool? > I'm considering the following for keep pool: > > SYS ICOL$ 20 TABLE > SYS IND$ 19 TABLE > SYS CLU$ 5 TABLE > SYS C_OBJ# 2 CLUSTER > SYS COL$ 21 TABLE > SYS TAB$ 4 TABLE > SYS COLTYPE$ 241 TABLE > SYS ATTRCOL$ 244 TABLE > SYS VIEWTRCOL$ 246 TABLE > SYS LOB$ 251 TABLE > SYS TYPE_MISC$ 253 TABLE > SYS NTAB$ 288 TABLE > SYS LIBRARY$ 293 TABLE > SYS REFCON$ 296 TABLE > SYS ICOLDEP$ 299 TABLE > > -- > - David > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. > -- > Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ > FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------