RE: is IPC really faster than TCPIP?
- From: Wolfson Larry - lwolfs <lawrence.wolfson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:33:26 -0500
Barr, Stephen [Stephen.Barr@xxxxxxxxx]
Stephen,
One of Cary's msgs said IPC and the other mentioned BEQueath. If
you can use BEQ it's going to be a hair faster because you don't have to go
through the listener. But, either way, if you're processing a row at a time
you'll be much faster with BEQ or IPC.
Should be a no brainer. Why put traffic on your network if you
don't have to?
The other people on the network may appreciate it too.
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barr, Stephen
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:48 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: is IPC really faster than TCPIP?
I'd be really interested in hearing the opinions of others on this - we are
thinking of implementing IPC on the recommendations of Informatica (our ETL
tool). We have a lot of network traffic due to the row-at-a-time processing
in informatica.
Informatica and Oracle are both on the same box.
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and
delete the original message or any copy of it from your
computer system. Thank You.
---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To read recent messages - //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
Other related posts:
