RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- To: "Khemmanivanh, Somckit" <somckit.khemmanivanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:54:13 -0700
Could be, but I don't know how we'd be able to verify that unless there is
something in the NAS or OS logs. The Unix admins told me they didn't see any
errors on the NAS, but maybe I'll ask them to double check.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Khemmanivanh, Somckit
Could there be some buffering of the writes involved here? i.e. The OS
writes to an FS cache and gives the all clear to lgwr but the write
never makes it to disk?
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?