[bksvol-discuss] Re: synopses
- From: "Bob" <rwiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:05:35 -0600
I agree, though "see long synopsis" is a phrase with promise.
I would rather see something like "adventure book see long synopsis.. Then I
know whether to bother or not.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Guido Corona
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:58 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: synopses
True enough Allison. However, when I read the sentence:
"see long synopsis",
my immediate and only reaction is that the submitter or validator is:
1. Glib.
2. Rude.
3. Lazy.
4. Has no pride of ownership.
At this point I feel that -- as a customer -- I am being told to 'eat cake'.
I then routinely ignore completely the book in question and move on to a book
prepared by a more responsible submitter/validator. If a submitter/validator
is capable of creating a long synopsis, they should be able to
extract/summarize a fragment appropriate for the short synopsis.
G.
Guido Dante Corona
IBM Research,
Human Ability & Accessibility Center, (HA&AC)
Austin Tx.
Phone: 512. 838. 9735.
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.ibm.com/able
". . . Maybe it was only those who were most certain they were right who were
guaranteed to be wrong. And that maybe, just maybe, those who questioned the
most were in the end those who came closest to being wise."
[David Poyer, The Command]
"Allison Hilliker" <bookshare_girl@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/17/2008 10:58 AM Please respond to
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: synopses
Hi all,
Pratic wrote:
">I would also suggest staying away from short synopses that say "see long
> synopsis." There is no need to state the obvious."
Actually Pratic, I think the statement about long synopses is a good thing.
If a book has nothing in the short synopsis field, then I am unlikely to go
looking for a long synopsis and usually don't end up downloading the book.
But if it tells me to read the long synopsis, then I will do that.
Similarly, if the short synopsis field is especially short, I won't take the
time to go look at the long synopsis field as I will assume it's equally
vague. Also,
some newer members may not realize that the synopsis field on the page they
find when they click the title, if they take the time to read it, is
actually longer than what they found when
they first saw the book. I hope that makes sense.
Best,
Allison
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pratik Patel" <pratikp1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:51 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: synopses
>I would also suggest staying away from short synopses that say "see long
> synopsis." There is no need to state the obvious. It's a waste of
> character space and helps no one.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grandma Cindy
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:02 AM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: synopses
>
> I thought the rules specifically said not to express
> opinions in synopses. You're right--a review is the
> place for that, and I've submitted quite a few of
> them. smile
>
> G.Cindy
>
> --- Meka <mekawh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This is not picking on anyone in particular because
>> now I don't even
>> remember the books where I have seen this. Hooray,
>> fully functional memory!
>>
>> I hope that as submitters/validators, we can steer
>> clear from the synopsis
>> that is consistently more like a book review.
>>
>> For example, I read a short synopsis that basically
>> said 'if you are wanting
>> some useless fluff, this will be a good book.' One
>> person's useless brain
>> fluff is another person's enjoyable book, hence why
>> I think there's a better
>> way to do it. I think that we could use the
>> review section (does that get
>> used anyway?) for that. Or synopses that have book
>> spoilers.
>>
>> I know it can be hard not to do this. I write book
>> reviews with my friend
>> for a blog that we both share and it's really hard
>> to do some good book
>> griping without spoiling important parts of the
>> book.
>>
>> This is not a gripe, just a suggestion, and one that
>> I want to follow as
>> well.
>>
>> Meka
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject
>> line. To get a list of available commands, put the
>> word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>>
>>
>
>
> WISH LIST (called Requested Additions To The Bookshare Collection)is
> available at
> http://people.delphiforums.com/jamiecalton/Book_Requests.htm
> http://www.friendsofbookshare.org/
> http://studentpages.alma.edu/~07jmyate/book_requests.htm
>
> www.jbrownell.com for miscellaneous and useful threads
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.4/1227 - Release Date: 1/16/2008
1:40 AM
Other related posts:
