Too bad Internet Explorer is the only browser out there that works at all well with screen readers. Internet explorer is very slow and full of security holes, but at least it works. I always wonder if it is the screen reader makers that are to blaim for the fact that only Explorer works, or if it is the companies that make the browsers. Maybe Microsoft is to blaim for copyrighting everything that makes Explorer work well? I started to suspect just how slow Explorer was when I tried the encyclopedia lookup feature in Kurzweil. Kurzweil loads everything pretty slowly, but I am absolutely certain it loads those encyclopedia articles much faster than any page is loaded in Explorer, and that is with show pictures off on a DSL connection. I have heard that firefox has an option to have a cursor as well as the mouse pointer, which might or might not help to make it usable with a screen reader. Has anyone tried it? I'm just glad that screen readers give us all the extra navigation options, so at least once the page loads we can navigate quickly. Sarah Van Oosterwijck http://home.earthlink.net/~netentity/