Anthony:
Marshall—which s not NASA, despite pretensions—-advocated for the use of
their non-existant “Fastrack” engine both internally and with contractors
but at least two proposals baselined hydrogen and solids, respectively.
Bill
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:40 PM Anthony Cesaroni <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Bantam? Wasn’t that the program that NASA said “you can propose any
propellant system you like as long as it’s LOX/Kerosene”? 😊
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
*From:* arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *On
Behalf Of *William Claybaugh
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 14, 2020 5:31 AM
*To:* arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [AR] Re: An update and a beg for some Propep type chemical
help.
Under Dan Golden’s Bantam program one contractor proposed a two stage all
Lox-Hydrogen vehicle that came in at 16,000 lbsm. GLOW (For the required
100 kg payload).
Beach launched from a truck; tanker truck fueling. It was by far the
lowest weight proposed vehicle for that capability; none, of course, could
meet the $1 million launch price requirement.
Bill
