RE: Exchange Protocol
- From: "Greg Mulholland" <greg_mul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:20:53 +1000
I am assuming that all the client machines have the same ver of Outlook on
them and the same win and outlook patches. Have you tested the cable itself,
although if it was a cable issue you really know about it. Cant they access
their mailbox via owa internally at a decent speed?
Greg Mulholland
Tech Services Manager
Harvey Norman
+613 98019333
greg_mul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenny Mann [mailto:Kennymann@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:15 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
http://www.MSExchange.org/
My mail box size is about 40MB.
The laptop's mailbox size is 55MB and the desktops is 115MB.
The interesting thing is that there are a couple people (3) that have a
bigger mail box.
The general manager has a 600MB mail box size.
I wouldn't think it's a network issue as surfing the internet and
transfering files aren't slow.
I did a scan of the network using nmap to see all services running, TCP
and UDP and found only a small few
extraneous things happening but nothing that should cripple or anything
that should be noticeable to anyone.
Thanks for your help!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:greg_mul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:56 AM
>To: [ExchangeList]
>Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Exchange Protocol
>
>
>http://www.MSExchange.org/
>
>Some good reading that might give you a bit of a heads up
>
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;256976&sd=tech
>
>How big are the fast mailboxes? How big is the other slow
>mailbox? Is this problem only specific to Exchange or is it a
>network issue?
>
>
>Greg Mulholland
>Tech Services Manager
>Harvey Norman
>+613 98019333
>greg_mul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kenny Mann [mailto:Kennymann@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:38 PM
>To: [ExchangeList]
>
>http://www.MSExchange.org/
>
>How does Exchange work as far as the clients are concerned?
>I have two machines, which I believe are under powered but my
>boss believes otherwise, that are slow at receiving mail. It
>is only these two machines having problems, everyone else is
>fine. One machine is a laptop, P4 processor w/ 256MB of memory
>with WinXP Pro. The other is a P2 400mgz w/ 256MB which is a
>desktop. The desktop is slow at loading Outlook (the processor
>peaks out) while the laptop shows no problems with speed. Our
>exchange server runs a firewall as well as Norton AV and is a
>Compaq Prolient ML330 G2, it runs ISA server as well. We have
>about 30-35 people running Outlook at all times. The problem
>is basically: These two people (especially the desktop) take a
>long while (30 minutes) to receive a piece of email that was
>sent in-house. For me, I receive it spontaneously however they
>do not. The time stamp on the email shows it was sent 30
>minutes ago. How would a single piece of email take so long to
>get from the server to the desktop? How does the Exchange
>protocol work? From what I understand it pushes email to the
>client yet still keeps it on the server. Is their somewhere I
>can go to read how it works? I tried google, but could not
>find what I was searching for. :-/ If this person has a big
>(115MB) email folder size, could this be the issue? If so,
>then why isn't everyone else effected?
>
>Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!
>
>Thanks!
>----------------------------------
>--Kenny Mann
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
>Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
>Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
>------------------------------------------------------
>Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
>Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
>No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
>Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
>Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows
>2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
>------------------------------------------------------
>You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion
>List as: greg_mul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank
>email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
>Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
>Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
>------------------------------------------------------
>Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
>Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
>No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
>Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
>Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows
>2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
>------------------------------------------------------
>You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion
>List as: kennymann@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank
>email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as:
greg_mul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
