Re: Disk partition for Ex2k with Disaster recovery....

  • From: "David Liles" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:16:06 -0500

I am in the process of identifying requirements for a new Exchange 2000 box and 
would like some clarification....
 
In an effort to keep costs manageable we were considering serial ATA drives in 
some sort of RAID configuration.
 
If we have a separate drive for the OS should it also be a serial ATA drive or 
can it be a standard IDE drive on one of the motherboard controllers? If not 
recommended, I guess it should also be a serial ATA drive on its own controller?
 
We were thinking of a RAID 5 configuration for the storing of the Exchange 
database and logs. This would be a separate serial ATA controller....
 
Not being a hardware techie... I'm not sure if I'm on the right path regarding 
the hardware configuration....
 
Any advice from those who are?

Thanks

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Fri 7/11/2003 2:52 AM 
        To: [ExchangeList] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [exchangelist] Re: Disk partition for Ex2k with Disaster 
recovery....
        
        
        http://www.MSExchange.org/
        

        If money is a concern, here is my .02:

         

        All drives Dynamic (unless mirroring the SCSI via hardware raid) and 
all NTFS.

         

        2 EIDE HD. 

        Partition 1                         Partition 2                         
         Partition 3

        Boot and OS (Mirrored)        Page File (One on each drive)         
Exchange Tran log (Mirrored)

         

        2 SCSI

        One partition. Mirrored. Exchange DB.

         

        The reason for have 2 page files, each on a separate partition on 
separate drives, is it is not recommended to mirror the page file, and having 2 
will keep you from having a blue screen in the event of a drive failure.

         

        John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA

        Engineer/Consultant

        eServices For You

        www.eservicesforyou.com

         

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Ryan Thomas [mailto:ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:37 AM
        To: [ExchangeList]
        Subject: [exchangelist] Re: Disk partition for Ex2k with Disaster 
recovery....

         

        http://www.MSExchange.org/

        Mirror Mirror on the wall .....

         

        Seriously buy another 40gB IDE as they are dirt cheap and mirror it, 
maybe do the same with the SCSI. Loads less hassle in the event of a drive 
failure.

         

        regards

         

        Ryan

                ----- Original Message ----- 

                From: Hirantha Wijayawardena <mailto:hirantha@xxxxxxxxxxx>  

                To: [ExchangeList] <mailto:exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

                Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:40 AM

                Subject: [exchangelist] Disk partition for Ex2k with Disaster 
recovery....

                 

                http://www.MSExchange.org/

                 

                Hi! Expertise,

                 

                Iâm planning to hookup another exchange 2000 server, with 
disaster recovery in mind. So I read some Microsoft articles with related to 
disaster recovery specially â Disaster recovery exchange 2000.pdf article. 
What they say is you have to have 6 hard disks.

                 

                Unfortunately I do not have much $$$$ â so my plan is to have 
a 2 SCSI Drivers â 18GB each and 1 IDE Hard Drive â 40GB, and the hard disk 
partition scheme is..

                 

                FDisk 1 (IDE HD) â Driver C: (Fat16)-windows 2000 boot files 
and Active drive, 100MB Primary partition

                -          Drive d: (NTFS) â windows 2000 operating system 
files and swap files Remaining capacity Extended Partition

                 

                FDisk 2 (SCSI) â Drive E: (NTFS) â Exchange 2000 files and 
additional server applications, 100% full extended partition

                 

                FDisk 3 (SCSI) â Drive F: (NTFS) â transaction log files 
and database files. 100% full extended partition

                 

                Can I know from you all is this disk partition setups are ok!

                This will give low performance due to use of the IDE HD?????????

                Or this is not the wayââ

                 

                Thank you in advance 

                 

                 

                Hirantha Wijayawardena

                ICT Co-ordinator

                Crescat Developments limited

                Mobile: 94-(0)72-2440308

                Tel: 94-(0)75-540404 Ext.221

                www.crescatcity.com

                 

                ------------------------------------------------------
                List Archives: 
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
                Exchange Newsletters: 
http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
                Exchange FAQ: 
http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
                ------------------------------------------------------
                Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
                Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
                No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
                Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
                Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
                Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
                ------------------------------------------------------
                You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion 
List as: info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
                To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
leave-exchangelist-1514701Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

        ------------------------------------------------------
        List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
        Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
        Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
        ------------------------------------------------------
        Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
        Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
        No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
        Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
        Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
        Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
        ------------------------------------------------------
        You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: 
johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
leave-exchangelist-1514701Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

        ------------------------------------------------------
        List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
        Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
        Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
        ------------------------------------------------------
        Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
        Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
        No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
        Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
        Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
        Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
        ------------------------------------------------------
        You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: 
dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
leave-exchangelist-1514701Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Other related posts: