Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



Browse oracle-l: This Month's ArchiveMain Archive PageRelated postsPrevious by DateNext by Date

Re: sga_max_size discrepancy

  • From: "Bradd Piontek" <piontekdd@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kmoore@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:29:32 -0500
Keith,
  Have you tried setting cpu_count to something a bit more reasonable for
the T2 chip you are running on or setting sga_target = 0

Bradd Piontek
Oracle Blog: http://piontekdd.blogspot.com
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/piontekdd


On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Keith Moore <kmoore@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Raj,
>
> Thanks. You put me on the right track but the granule size is actually 4M
> and...
>
> NAME               TYPE        VALUE
> ------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
> cpu_count          integer     64
>
> Here's the deal. These are the Sun "cool thread" servers and while our zone
> only has 1 real CPU, each CPU has 64 threads of execution and to Oracle
> that
> looks like 64 CPUs.
>
> We moved the zone from an older server (32 threads per CPU) to a newer
> server
> (64 threads per CPU) and the buffer cache doubled in size.
>
> I don't know what if anything I can do about this. Need to research
> further.
>
> Here's another calculated value that is way too high.
>
> NAME                    TYPE        VALUE
> ----------------------- ----------- ------------------------------
> parallel_max_servers    integer     185
>
> BTW, on CPU intensive tasks these servers are about 25% the speed of other
> Sun
> processors. I've heard they are equivalent to a 300 MHz processor. They are
> best suited to applications like web servers where there are many processes
> but each request is small. OLTP databases might be another good use.
>
> I'm not sure our development environment with a few users is the right
> application. On the other hand we are running 20 databases on a relatively
> cheap server. Either way, I wasn't consulted.
>
> Keith
>
>
> > Keith,
> >
> > do you have 4 CPUs? then it might make sense because in absence of
> > sga_target setting, db_cache_size will default to 4mb * #cpus * granule
> > size.
> >
> > I am guessing granule size as 16M so, if you have 4cpus, the min
> > db_cache_size will be 256m (or 8 cpus if granule size is 8m).
> >
> > Raj
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

Other related posts:

  • sga_max_size discrepancy
  • Re: sga_max_size discrepancy
  • Re: sga_max_size discrepancy
  • Re: sga_max_size discrepancy
  • Re: sga_max_size discrepancy




  • [ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

    All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
    Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.