
|
RE: wio above 20% - is that high?
- From: "Cary Millsap" <cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:35:01 -0600
Susan,
One way I'd encourage you to think about your question is to ask:
- Is there *any* circumstance under which a really high value might be
acceptable (or perhaps even desirable)?
- Is there *any* circumstance under which a really low value might be
unacceptable?
I haven't thought your particular question through to the end, but in my
experience, every time I've ever analyzed a question of your question's
format in this way, I've discovered that there is NO threshold that can =
be
counted upon to indicate even the presence or absence of a problem. When =
you
can't even reliably tell whether there *is* a problem or not, then you
certainly can't use the metric to measure anything about *how* good or =
bad a
problem might be. I've found every system-wide utilization metric I've =
ever
analyzed to lead me to the same dead end (including the database buffer
cache hit ratio, various latch miss ratios, the %sys CPU ratio, various =
I/O
rates, index vs full-scan break-even ratios, even system-wide average
response time).
Every time I've done the analysis I'm suggesting, I've found the same
conclusion: stop looking at derivative metrics like system-wide =
utilization
rates, and start looking at what really matters: response times of
individual, prioritized business tasks.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 1/4 Calgary
- SQL Optimization 101: 12/13 Atlanta
- Hotsos Symposium 2005: March 6-10 Dallas
- Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of susan lam
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:32 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: wio above 20% - is that high?
Is the wio below considered too high? One of the folks
here thinks that as long as there are ample CPU %idle,
it's fine. I think that wio is fine if it remains in
the single digit or spikes occasionally but not
prolong over a long period of time which in my case -
over 20mins. Also, I think because of the
high wio, the %usr remains low.=20
Any thoughts?
thanks.
susan=20
16:28:06 %usr %sys %wio %idle
16:28:10 3 3 22 71
16:28:14 2 2 15 80
16:28:18 2 3 15 80
16:28:22 3 4 20 73
16:28:26 2 4 17 77
16:28:30 3 4 22 71
16:28:34 2 3 17 78
16:28:38 2 3 20 75
16:28:42 4 22 14 60
16:28:46 1 26 11 61
16:28:50 2 28 17 52
16:28:54 4 24 18 54
16:28:58 3 26 22 48
16:29:02 15 10 24 51
16:29:06 12 6 24 60
16:29:10 11 4 18 67
16:29:14 3 4 22 71
16:29:18 2 4 19 75
16:29:22 2 3 17 78
16:29:26 4 6 21 70
16:29:30 2 4 17 76
16:29:34 2 3 18 77
16:29:38 3 4 11 82
16:29:42 2 2 18 79
16:29:46 2 3 17 78
16:29:50 2 3 22 74
16:29:54 3 4 20 74
16:29:58 2 4 16 78
16:30:02 4 5 20 72
16:30:06 2 2 15 80
16:30:10 2 3 13 83
16:30:14 4 4 22 70
16:30:18 3 4 22 71
16:30:22 1 2 12 84
16:30:26 3 4 20 73
16:30:30 2 4 24 70
16:30:34 2 4 15 79
16:30:38 2 3 12 83
16:30:42 2 3 11 84
16:30:46 1 2 16 82
16:30:50 3 5 22 71
=09
__________________________________=20
Do you Yahoo!?=20
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.=20
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:wio above 20% - is that high? Re: wio above 20% - is that high? RE: wio above 20% - is that high? RE: wio above 20% - is that high?
|

|

|
[ Home |
Signup |
Help |
Login |
Archives |
Lists
]
All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned
by their respective owners. Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.
|

|
|